A good two sided argument on the Shutdown

A good two sided argument on the Shutdown

I read this, and they make a good point, they really do, but let’s look at the big picture…The soda machine may be popular, and everyone may like it, but the company it is costing the company $15,000 per year to run it, in return the company only makes $10,000 per year off of it, meaning they are adding $5,000 per year in debt each year just for a soda machine, furthermore the current one is broken, and a new one would have a startup cost of $20,000. Seeing as no bank in their right mind would lend money to something that is loosing money, Bill has to stop paying everyone so they can continue to afford the soda machine, thus shutting the company down. 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: